Schedule Services
×

Make a Payment

Please enter the name as it reads on the credit card and address that is associated with the credit card. If you are paying 1-2 invoices, please complete the invoice number section in the form below. If you are paying more than two invoices, please submit payment and send an email to AR@huseby.com with the invoice numbers as a reference.


×

Thank you!

Huseby Global Litigation appreciates your payment.

×
Schedule Services

The Huseby Journal

Flap over fired court reporter prompts New York Times to ask, 'Are Court Stenographers Necessary?'

State Supreme Court in Manhattan. Photo by Beyond My KenCategory:Architectural sculptures, via Wikimedia Commons. State Supreme Court in Manhattan. Photo by Beyond My KenCategory:Architectural sculptures, via Wikimedia Commons.

The recent revelation that a court reporter in New York typed gibberish and impacted the transcripts of 30 court cases prompted a flood of reports, as well as a debate in The New York Times about the use of court reporters.

The New York Post quoted the reporter, Daniel Kochanski, as well as his father and ex-wife in a story that was published last Friday. The men cited alcohol abuse as a cause of the behavior.

“The pressure of that job pushed him over the edge, leading him to lose everything,” the ex-wife told the Post.

The missing records impacted six trials and at least two dozen other proceedings of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

Read more.

Debate ensues In The New York Times’ first report on Kochanski, a supervising attorney handling an appeal related to the Kochanski situation said, “Why are we in this 18th-century system where someone is taking it down in their own indecipherable notes?”

A spokesman for the Office of Court Administration said in the Times, “This is a complete anomaly. The court reporters perform an incredibly difficult task every day and do it in an extraordinary way.”

Read more.

Are court reporters necessary? The Times later published a Room for Debate post on its website in which legal professionals took sides on the issue of court reporting vs. digital recorders, headlined “Are Court Stenographers Necessary?”

Commenters Nancy Varallo of the National Court Reporters Association, federal judge Richard Kopf, Minneapolis district court judge Peter Cahill, digital recording system salesman Brian Green and Stuart Auslander of the New York School of Court Reporting sounded off from their various perspectives.

You can read more here, as well as comment on the issue.

Huseby court reporters husebyhHuseby hires only the very best reporters. Each reporter is screened before hiring to ensure his or her work meets the company’s high standards. When a reporter wishes to work for Huseby, an account executive follows a stringent reporter review process.

If you need dependable court reporting in New York, Huseby has conference room suites in the Big Apple ready for you to use today. Huseby offices offer litigation services, including court reporting, Web conferencing, video conferencing, video depositions, and more.

Our office in Manhattan is at this location:

1501 Broadway, New York, NY 10036

Call (646) 292-4050 or (800) 333-2082 to schedule.

Looking for help in a different city? Call a Huseby scheduler and ask. We have more than 4,000 conference room suites worldwide ready for you to use today. (800) 333-2082.

Author
Huseby